X
Story Stream
recent articles

Immigration Reform Can’t Wait Another 40 Years

February 04, 2026

Forty years ago, Congress passed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

It was the last time our legislature passed a comprehensive immigration reform, and it helps explain how immigration has become a festering wound that will not heal.

The events in Minneapolis these past few weeks have pushed America to the breaking point. Hopefully, it wakes up our leaders to the reality that the time for posturing and politicking on immigration has long passed. More people will die if this continues. It is time for Congress to do its job and fix our broken immigration system.

Last week, Republican Congressman Mike Lawler of New York published an op-ed in the New York Times calling for exactly that. The deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, Lawler wrote, show that “what the country has been doing is not working.” He called on his colleagues to stop retreating to partisan corners and start building a realistic plan to fix a broken system.

Lawler outlined what that plan requires. Build on the Trump administration’s border security progress while reassessing enforcement tactics that have caused chaos in American communities. Create a path to legal status for long-term undocumented immigrants without criminal records, one that is rigorous and fair and keeps families together. Reform legal immigration to better account for economic needs and merit.

He also urged something that should not be controversial: collaboration between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Minneapolis showed what happens when that collaboration breaks down. Fortunately, last week brought signs that leaders in Washington and Minneapolis are stepping back from the brink and working to build a durable way forward.

Still, that will not change the fact that only Congress can change the laws governing our immigration system. Other members should take a cue from Rep. Lawler and get to work.

As the immigration debate continues, you are likely to hear plenty of talk about “sanctuary cities” – but this is a political term, not a legal one.

The term “sanctuary city” refers to a range of local policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Some jurisdictions, like Houston and Miami, maintain moderate cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) while limiting certain inquiries. Others, such as New York and Chicago, require judicial warrants before transferring detainees in cases involving serious offenses. A smaller group, including Seattle and the State of California, shares minimal information and keeps systems largely separate from federal enforcement.

These distinctions matter. Lumping all sanctuary policies together makes it harder to have an honest conversation about what is working, what is not, and what changes would actually improve public safety.

Certain moments in American politics force action. Minneapolis may be that moment for immigration reform. The question is whether Congress will seize it or retreat to familiar corners, letting the issue fester for another four decades.

Congressman Lawler put it plainly: “There will be no Democratic or Republican solution on immigration, only an American one.”

And Americans should be encouraged that leaders are already reaching across the aisle. Last week, Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey announced the ICE Standards Act, bipartisan legislation to establish professional guardrails for federal immigration enforcement. The bill responds to the tragedy in Minneapolis by requiring mandatory training, the use of body cameras, and advance coordination with local law enforcement.

It is exactly the kind of serious governing the country needs: tough on enforcement, protective of constitutional rights, and focused on commonsense solutions rather than partisan posturing.

This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

Dan Webb is a member of the board at No Labels.

Newsletter Signup